Watch how the corner of Collins’ jacket moves in this clip.
Apollo_11__The_TV_Transmission_Conspiracy_Theorists_Hate_.mp4
The corner of Collins’ jacket swings back and forth the way it would in gravity.
(00:52 time mark)
Look at the corners of the jacket the woman astronaut is wearing in this clip.
Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station
That is real zero-gravity and they behave quite differently.
The movement of Collins’ jacket corner is very different from that of the straps in this clip which is in zero-G. (3:17 time mark)
Our World: Exercise Equipment
Collins’ jacket corners behave the same way as the corners in this footage which was taken on Earth.
ISS space station treadmill running
The footage with Collins was not taken halfway to the moon. It was taken in strong earth gravity. One possible explanation is that they were trying to fake zero-gravity in a diving plane and the plane wasn’t diving fast enough at that point. I’d bet they were on the ground though; that looked like pretty strong gravity.
Do you know how to create Google Docs? I’d recommend you do this for any topic that you want to prove out, in full.
In order for something to be “Good” evidence or “Smoking Gun”, we gotta drill into the low-level details and then scrutinize it. If you can’t generally win a debate with an Apollogist (by neutral standards, not the Apollogist’s standards) – the topic will remain here as “Debatable”. If the idea gets “beat out” generally- then it becomes “Bad Evidence”.
===
I watched the Collin’s jacket video and see what you mean. However, we might be comparing Apples to Oranges here.
It’s possible to have a jacket with another stiffness where it’s elasticity is trying to retain a specific form, and this would create a similar motion as the pendulum motion we are seeing here.
Where as a more flimsy shirt would not.
===
However, I think this is a good clip to watch, as it certainly “looks” like there is gravity at work here… but IMO, it’s non-conclusive, until more work is done for the proof.
It looks promising to me. But I can’t say I’m convinced (yet) that this is “good evidence”. Need some scrutiny and more details, IMO.
